这是一部黑白片子,但我从头到尾都没有感受到女同色彩,我认为本片的核心是批判,通过同性之爱批判当时社会现状,为什么很多学生喜欢女老师并爱上女老师?这背后的原因是当时社会迂腐制度的必然结果。
这所军官家属的女子学校,校长们高呼德国意志信仰培养学生,老师却必须摆出高高在上姿态,服从是学生们的必须义务,学生给家里写信要被老师看过才能寄出,毫无平等自由可言。
而那位思想平等的老师成为了所有女生喜欢的对象,她关心学生,不咄咄逼人,很多女生都爱她喜欢她,她是被学校压迫下所有学生内心唯一可以慰藉的光,但需要强调是这不是爱,在那种环境下,那么多人爱上女老师是必言,是时代造成的必然,一位喜欢女老师的女生在醉酒后说出对女老师的喜欢被校长听到,校长要求所有老师学生孤立她,女学生无奈跳楼,好在有惊无险,女老师与校长谴责学校方式的影响,最后校长浑浑噩噩在走廊中行走的背影,让我看到了根深蒂固的压迫思想可能会觉醒的一丝丝微光。
通过很直白的方式体现了寄宿学校中女孩们受到的普鲁士式教育的摧残,因为拍摄的年代很早,黑白画面还有低画质让整个氛围显得有些阴森……严苛的校长认为纪律与饥饿才能让普鲁士重获荣光,作为士兵的子女,寄宿的女孩们不仅不允许拥有自己的零用钱,出行和着装被严格限制,连发出的信件也要受到审核。印象很深的是校长让各位学生排队站好,一排排走过去检查仪容仪表,与其说是“检查”不如说是在“检阅”,当然,学生们并没有因学校的纪律而磨灭自己的个性以及年轻人所有的热情、好奇心、乐观,电影中出现的配角都相当有个性,伊尔莎喜欢收藏当红明星的海报,嘲讽不近人情的校长。伯恩博格老师与校长不同,她坚信仁慈才能感化孩子们,她在睡前亲吻每一个女孩,用包容的心对待她们。我觉得玛奴薇拉爱上老师这件事是必然的,她缺失的母爱在温柔的老师那里得到了弥补,她与老师的血液里同样流淌着的叛逆因子,她们是普鲁士畸形教育的挑战者,玛奴薇拉难以独自挑战强大畸形教育的卫道士,她依然选择用最惨烈的方式(自杀)表达自己的不屈,她的努力唤醒了其他受残害的女孩,虽然这场对决实力悬殊,但最终她们获得了胜利。玛奴薇拉和伯恩博格老师之间的感情圣洁如白百合
*合唱中*
黑短发女孩乱入:"每个人都竭力大喊 我们什么时候开饭呀?"
——"你知道你住哪间宿舍吗?" ——"马加尔说我住冯·伯恩伯格夫人的宿舍" ——"当心别坠入爱河!因为所有的女孩都对伯恩伯格夫人一见钟情"
女校长:"我们普鲁士人不懂得饥饿 她们是士兵的孩子 若能如愿 也将成为士兵的母亲!通过纪律和挨饿 我们才能重返光荣 否则根本不可能"
姨母:"军官的女儿居然还哭!"
——"…我想到等我再长大些就得离开这学校 每天晚上您也会亲吻其他女孩…" ——"你都在想些什么啊" ——"我太爱您了!"
——"妈妈说我不能太柔弱 祖国需要钢铁一般的人民" ——"我妈妈也在这里待过四年 她难道忘了这里环境多糟么?"
女教师:"我不会放不下我的岗位 我知道我不能再留在这里 我不能站在一旁看着孩子们成为被恐吓的无助的动物"
Double features time! German female filmmaker Leontine Sagan’s MÄDCHEN IN UNIFORM is a vanguard of queer cinema made in 1931, and William Wyler’s THESE THREE, arrived 5 years later, is based on Lilian Hellman’s sapphic play The Children’s Hour, but lesbianism is completely effaced due to the Hays Code, and Wyler would later remake a “veritable” version in 1961 starring Audrey Hepburn, Shirley MacLaine and James Garner.
MÄDCHEN IN UNIFORM is adapted from Christa Winsloe’s play and old hand Carl Froelich is credited as the artistic director to lend a helping hand to Sagan’s first feature. Corralling an all-female cast, the story is exclusively confined in an all-girl boarding school in the dog end of the Weimar Republic.
Governed by a prim and property headmistress (Unda, an exemplary schoolmarm adorned by a pair of pince-nez), the school aims to groom young daughters from military families to be child-bearers of future soldiers, the headmistress exclaims that they should be raised on hunger and discipline. But where there is oppression, there is revolt, not all the girls are toeing the line, especially the vivacious Ilse von Westhagen (Schwanneke), a mischief-maker whose misdeed (smuggling letter to her parents for more money because them girls are always hungry, even in Sundays), doesn’t deteriorate only because the caring intervention of Fraülein von Bernburg (Wieck), the judicious, tender governess who doesn’t see eye to eye with headmistress’ imperious command.
Fraülein von Bernburg is the star teacher that every girl admires and adores, and her goodnight kiss is a ritual of utter bliss. For a 14-year-old Manuela (Thiele), her attachment to Fraülein von Bernburg is more intense, unlike others, their goodnight kiss is on the lips, and she falls in love with her (she can barely speak in front of Fraülein von Bernburg, a fool-proof sign of infatuation), but as an adult, Fraülein von Bernburg knows better not to spoil this fragile bond and overstep the boundary. When Manuela is the worse for drink after a successful school play, she lets slip her secret in a fit of euphoria, and its repercussions are resoundingly pathos-stricken, yet, the film is anything but a misery porn, after flags up its anti-Fascist message, it propitiously brings down the curtains and leaves the denouement in ambiguity rather than anything more concrete. That said, its "love is love" affirmation ought not to be eclipsed by its vehement political opprobrium.
Wieck has a very peculiar presence of mind and impassive mien which suggests charisma, mystery and indissolubility, and Thiele possesses that photogenic and expressive visage of innocuousness, youthfulness and vulnerability, it is very hard to credit they have the same age, both were born in 1908. Kudos to the casting process! Then, speaking of Sagan’s directorial endeavor, it is to her credit that we do not feel constrained in a single location, her camera never feels plodding, her sense of composition is overall felicitous, like the vertiginous shot which foreshadows where a tragedy might occur, or the remarkable close-ups foregrounded in soft focus. Moreover, her female identity also helps to reassure the young female cast and elicit most spontaneous reactions and outburst from them, not to mention the jubilant solidarity. Sagan’s proficiency can contend with those from any member of the other sex, yet she only made three movies in her entire life, which makes MÄDCHEN IN UNIFORM such a puissant hue and cry to redress the inequality in the director’s chair, and individually, it is an endearingly stirring film completed with true grits and pluperfect tact.
THESE THREE, on the other hand, except for being marred for its inborn cop-out, is almost identical with THE CHILDREN’S HOUR (1961), Hellman’s dialogue remains largely intact even if the central Uranian affection is debased to a heteronormative love triangle. Two best-friends-cum-school-teachers, Martha Dobie (Hopkins) and Karen Wright (Oberon), both attract to the wholesomely handsome doctor Joseph Cardin (McCrea), but he takes the shine to Karen, so Martha has to hide her feelings.
But a vicious lie from one of their care, the bratty, self-serving, manipulative Mary Tilford (Granville) will shatter the fabric of their school and relationships, as simple as that. However, poetic justice might arrive belatedly, it is never absent. But by that point, audience might be too despondent and benumbed to toss a care. Most afterthought can be aptly copied from my review of THE CHILDREN’S HOUR (1961), but there are some divergence.
For one thing, Granville’s Oscar-nominated performance of an obnoxious bad seed is so extreme and single-minded (Patty McCormack gives a more superior impression of spill-chilling apathy in Mervyn LeRoy’s THE BAD SEED, 1956), a sense of awe actually transpires when she finally gets a whack in the face, in the hands of none other than the fearsome Margaret Hamilton, how satisfactory it is! And in the realm of prodigious child actors, Marcia Mae Jones’ extraordinary embodiment of the patsy Rosalie Wells is every bit as stupendous if not more. Tellingly, those young girls' copious theatrics may betray the difference whether they are handled by a man or a woman.
While THESE THREE is unexceptionable in its narratology and stock soundstage artificiality, no one should deny Hellman’s script is a fertile land for its actresses, Catherine Doucet’s highfalutin and exceedingly self-serving Auntie Mortar (a role played by Hopkins in the 1961 remake) might be bracketed as one of the most odious characters ever on the screen (with Granville’s Mary hot on her heels), yet her unrepentant carriage and locution is fabulous to gape. As a different kind of irritant, Amelia Tilford, Mary’s doting grandmother, stage thespian Alma Kruger, in her very first screen role, presides over with utter composure and later, registers a dignified pang of guilt and pain that comes to save the day.
Among the three leads, McCrea ekes out just adequate charm to convince us he is a catcher, he has more fun throwing sideswipes at Auntie Mortar than spouting sweet-nothings; and Oberon, right in her prime and is game enough to be chipper but also has that essential demureness as a classic Hollywood diva, almost virtuous to a fault. So, we can only rely on Hopkins to ginger up a semblance of perversion that goes missing in the revamped story, and she is there does what she does best, adding layers and layers of pent-up emotions (both to Joseph and her aunt) even there is nothing happens exteriorly. Why her Martha shouldn’t have a darling of her own? There must be a man for her in Vienna too, perhaps a woman even? In THESE THREE’s gynophobic backwater, Martha is an echt heroine and the film fails her cravenly.
referential entries: Wyler’s THE CHILDREN’S HOUR (1961, 7.3/10); Josef von Sternberg’s THE BLUE ANGEL (1930, 7.4/10).
Title: Mädchen in Uniform
Year: 1931
Country: Germany
Language: German, French, English
Genre: Drama, Romance
Director: Leontine Sagan
Screenwriters: Christa Winsloe, Friedrich Dammann
based on the play by Christa Winsloe
Music: Hanson Milde-Meissner
Cinematography: Reimer Kuntze, Franz Weihmayr
Editing: Oswald Hafenrichter
Cast:
Hertha Thiele
Dorothea Wieck
Emilia Unda
Hedy Krilla
Ellen Schwanneke
Gertrud de Lalsky
Erika Mann
Annemarie von Rochhausen
Else Ehser
Rating: 8.1/10
Title: These Three
Year: 1936
Country: USA
Language: English
Genre: Drama, Romance
Director: William Wyler
Screenwriter: Lillian Hellman
Music: Alfred Newman
Cinematography: Gregg Toland
Editing: Daniel Mandell
Cast:
Miriam Hopkins
Merle Oberon
Joel McCrea
Catherine Doucet
Bonita Granville
Alma Kruger
Marcia Mae Jones
Carmencita Johnson
Walter Brennan
Margaret Hamilton
Rating: 6.7/10
作为历史上第一部女同片,其实我觉得女性之间的爱还是表达得比较含蓄的,如果不是夫人对女主特别的吻,以及上课时看向女主的目光,再加上女主最后因为再也见不到她想跳楼,我还差点以为这只是单纯的学生对温柔、理解学生的老师的倾慕崇拜。这部电影虽然是以学生与夫人之间的爱为线索,但我觉得它更多是在批判那个时候偏执地以纪律为上,贫穷就是幸福为上的思想(其实我觉得贫穷本质上还是经济本来就不好,校长为了要面子才这样说的)。最后校长黯然地退场,其实暗示着旧思想旧规则终将退场,人们终将迎来适合他们的真正幸福的生活。 其他:学生们在老师不在场时一起欢腾的场面以及学校工作人员也跟着他们一起欢乐的场面真的太可爱啦。
老师你真的好美
美人+制服+御系诱惑,52年版真的比老版烂太多。
无论是演员的表演还是对角色性格的展现都远不如之后的翻拍版本。
女孩的情感灼热而又纯真,女老师压抑而又感性,但是时代和身份却是她们无法跨越的樊篱。
3.5. You're not allowed to love me... so much.
一部31年的黑白片击败当今一大片拉片!!!
1.乔丹·斯科特《裂缝》经典原本,影史首部女同电影。即使尊为鼻祖,影片本身之于同性情恋的描写却是极其隐晦和克制的,更多是针对当时德国斯巴达式教育体制及强权主义的控诉、批判,同时众数女性的主创阵容亦可视为30年代女性自主意识觉醒的预示。2.反叛精神因为感情的诚挚而倍显动人。少女仰慕纯真白净,伯恩伯格的感性又兼有一丝隐忍的忧愁,只是受限时代与身份的桎梏,过于炽烈的爱终究无了期。3.世纪一吻,沉淀百年之美。4.开放式结局:校长穿过人潮独自走进长廊,被前方光亮所吞没。(8.5/10)
女主美爆
8/8.5 作为直男已经为这部作品中的女性之美深深折服 虽然影片深处表达出对普鲁士式斯巴达棍棒教育的鞭笞 但作品本身最耀眼的光辉还是那群活泼可爱青春年少的姑娘以及冷艳而沉静的Frau.Bornberg 这部充满着自由气息的作品也只有在魏玛时代才会出现吧 它糅合着传统普鲁士的不近人情的冷酷坚毅的作风与1918后自由的朝气 充分反映出了不同的三代人的观念--刻板的校长 严格而温柔的教师 朝气蓬勃渴望自由的年轻人 最后校长一个人落寞消失在长廊尽头的镜头让人感到伤感 它仿佛让人看到了1945年后彻底消失的那个最传统的普鲁士要素的德国;十分赞同作品中的一个观点 即身为人师最重要的原则是公正/die Gleichheit;作为30年代的老片 我十分中意当时的作品不含杂质的纯粹艺术性的观感
格調在於Les女教師並非頽廢和玩世不恭,放到今時今日你會不會受些啓發?
【8.3】世界上第一部女同片,其实看完后才发现卖点并不是这个。说的应该还是批判德国当时的教育制度吧。不过这片被禁挺让我意外的。所以说掌握权力的人,往往是思想最落后的。还有老师嫁我!太美了!每个特写镜头都美到爆炸!女主也是!加上其他颜值都不低,风格各异的妹子!这片就算只看脸也值了!
女同色彩更强烈些,给每个人一个吻
老师美呆了
史称“世界首部女同性恋电影”,其实更深刻的意义在于对高压、专制的教育体制的控诉。
实力证明黑白电影,并不会因为年代久远而显得枯燥乏味。两位女主的颜值都很高,酒后吐真言,爱要大声说出来。主要还是为了批判当时魏玛共和国的教育。8.0
调子是复杂且含混的,心碎的自觉悲情与欣慰的柔光唯美。我们可以看到影片是个性别单一且空间封闭的室内剧,最终以学生——教员对军事化集权体制的象征性表态与反抗,没有明确成果。若以如此方式作论,那么影片同样可以视作与当时社会意识形态相左的行为——银幕上对女同的尝试。2q
该片为世界首部女同性恋电影,位列1995年评选出的“最伟大的一百部德国电影”第44位。虽然后来的历史学家认为此片是“德国女同性恋者争取解放的最著名呼声……直接而有力”,但当时很多德国观众认为其主题在于影射当时普鲁士法律和社会制度的冷酷。1958年还有一个翻拍版本。
有一个苹果挂在枝头,是采果子的人将它遗漏? 不是,是没有人能得手——萨福
史上第一部女同片,但正如许多评论家所指出的,本片的女同色彩并不浓,重点还是批评德国社会的斯巴达教育。
电影史上第一部“女同电影”,大概也是最好的女同电影之一。